4.4 Article

A Refined Cytochrome P540 IC50 Shift Assay for Reliably Identifying CYP3A Time-Dependent Inhibitors

Journal

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1054-1057

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038208

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A refined cytochrome P450 (P450) enzyme IC50 shift assay for more accurately screening CYP3A time-dependent inhibitors (TDIs) is presented. In contrast to the regular IC50 shift assay, in which only one pair of P450 inhibition curves is generated, this modified method generates two pairs of inhibition curves; one pair of curves is created from human liver microsomal incubations with the test article in the presence or absence of NADPH (curves 1 and 2) (same as the traditional assay), and the other pair is created from new microsomal incubations with extract (compound/metabolites) of previous incubations (curves 3 and 4). To assess the true CYP3A time-dependent inhibition, we propose a new parameter, the vertical IC50 curve shift (VICS), represented by vertical shift difference between the two sets of curves divided by inhibitor concentration at which maximal vertical shift of curves 1 and 2 is observed. A shift in the curves 1 and 2 could mean a time-dependent inhibition or formation of a more active inhibitory metabolite(s). The new method provides more reliable characterization of the shift as a result of a true TDI- or metabolite-mediated reversible inhibition. Nine known TDI drugs were evaluated using this refined shift assay. The derived VICS values correlated well with the reported k(inact)/K-I values derived via the conventional dilution assay method. Thus, the refined assay can be used to identify a true TDI and quantitatively assess the inactivation potential of TDIs in a high-throughput fashion. This assay can be invaluable to screen for true P450 TDIs in the early drug discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available