4.4 Article

Drug Transporter Expression and Localization in Rat Nasal Respiratory and Olfactory Mucosa and Olfactory Bulb

Journal

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
Volume 38, Issue 10, Pages 1644-1647

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.034611

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK068039]
  2. University of Cincinnati and Center for Environmental Genetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uptake of drugs and other xenobiotics from the nasal cavity and into either the brain or systemic circulation can occur through several different mechanisms, including paracellular transport and movement along primary olfactory nerve axons, which extend from the nasal cavity to the olfactory bulb of the brain. The present study was conducted to expand knowledge on a third means of uptake, namely the expression of drug transporters in the rat nasal epithelium. We used branched DNA technology to compare the level of expression of nine transporters [(equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT) 1 and ENT2; organic cation transporter (OCT)1, 2, and 3; OCTN1; organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)3; and multidrug resistance (MRP) 1 and MRP4] in nasal respiratory mucosa, olfactory mucosa, and olfactory bulb to the level of expression of these transporters in the liver and kidney. Transporters with high expression in the nasal respiratory mucosa or olfactory tissues were immunolocalized by immunohistochemistry. ENT1 and ENT2 expression was relatively high in nasal epithelia and olfactory bulb, which may explain the uptake of intranasally administered nucleoside derivatives observed by other investigators. OATP3 immunoreactivity was high in olfactory epithelium and olfactory nerve bundles, which suggests that substrates transported by OATP3 may be candidates for intranasal administration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available