4.4 Article

Stability of sulforaphane for topical formulation

Journal

DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 494-502

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2013.768634

Keywords

Activator-protein-1; base catalysis; degradation; hydrolysis; in vivo; isothiocyanate; UVB

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01CA027502, K07CA132956]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Sulforaphane (SFN) is a natural compound that has been investigated as a chemopreventive agent. SFN has been shown to inhibit the activator-protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor and may be effective for inhibition of ultraviolet (UV) induced skin carcinogenesis. This study was designed to investigate the stability of SFN as a function of pH, temperature and in various solvents and formulations. Materials and methods: Stability was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. A potential lead formulation was identified and evaluated in vivo. Results: SFN was determined to undergo apparent first-order degradation kinetics for the conditions explored. It was observed that SFN undergoes base catalyzed degradation. Buffer species and solvent type impacts stability as well. SFN was found to be very sensitive to temperature with degradation rate changing by a factor of nearly 3.1 for every 10 degrees C change in temperature (at pH 4.0). SFN completely degraded after 30 days in a conventional pharmaceutical cream formulation. Improved stability was observed in organic formulation components. Stability studies were conducted on two nonaqueous topical formulations: a polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment base and an organic oleaginous base. Conclusion: Topically applied SFN in the PEG base formulation significantly reduced AP-1 activation after UV stimulation in the skin of a transgenic mouse model, indicating that SFN in this formulation retains efficacy in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available