4.4 Article

Development of dorzolamide hydrochloride in situ gel nanoemulsion for ocular delivery

Journal

DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 1330-1339

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/03639041003801885

Keywords

Bioavailability; dorzolamide hydrochloride; in situ gel; nanoemulsion; ocular

Funding

  1. National Research Centre, Egypt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Several in situ gel-forming systems have been developed to prolong the precorneal residence time of a drug and to improve ocular bioavailability. Poloxamer 407 with its thermoreversible gelation and surface active properties was utilized to formulate a novel dorzolamide hydrochloride in situ gel nanoemulsion (NE) delivery system for ocular use. Objective: Improvement of both ocular bioavailability and duration of action for dorzolamide hydrochloride was the aim of this study. Methods: Physicochemical properties, in vitro drug release studies and biological evaluation of the prepared NEs were investigated. Results: The optimum formulation of in situ gel NE consisted of Triacetin (7.80%), Poloxamer 407 (13.65%), Poloxamer 188 (3.41%), Miranol C2M (4.55%), and water (70.59%). Biological evaluation of the designed dorzolamide formulation on normotensive albino rabbits indicated that this formulation had better biological performance, faster onset of action, and prolonged effect relative to either drug solution or the market product. The formula showed a superior pharmacodynamic activity compared to the in situ gel dorzolamide eye drops. This indicated the effectiveness of the in situ gel properties of poloxamer 407, besides formulating the drug in an NE form for improving the therapeutic efficacy of the drug. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the superiority of in situ gel NE to conventional ocular eye drops and in situ gels to enhance ocular drug bioavailability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available