4.7 Article

Inhaled pyrazinamide proliposome for targeting alveolar macrophages

Journal

DRUG DELIVERY
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 334-345

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2012.721144

Keywords

Dry powder inhaler; immunological response; liposome; pulmonary; tuberculosis

Funding

  1. National Research Council of Thailand
  2. Prince of Songkla University National Research University Project of Thailand's Office of the Higher Education Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In this study, pyrazinamide (PZA)-proliposome in a dry powder aerosol form was developed for delivering drugs to alveolar macrophages (AMs) infected with mycobacteria. Materials and methods: PZA-proliposomes consisting of pyrazinamide, soybean phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and porous mannitol were prepared by a spray drying method. The PZA-proliposome physicochemical properties were determined using a cascade impactor, X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and infrared spectroscopy. The toxicity of proliposomes to respiratory-associated cell lines (Calu-3, A549 and NR8383) and its potential to provoke immunological responses from AMs were determined. In vivo repeated dose toxicity in rats was evaluated. Results and discussion: PZA-proliposomes were successfully prepared. For the aerosolization properties of PZA-proliposomes at 60 l/min, the powders showed mass median aerodynamic diameters of 4.26-4.39 mu m, with fine particle fractions (aerosolized particles less than 4.4 mu m) of 20-30%. Encapsulation of PZA was 26-45%. PZA-proliposomes were less toxic to respiratory-associated cells, and did not activate AMs to produce inflammatory mediators, including interleukin-1 beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and nitric oxide, at a toxic level. Renal and liver toxicity in rats were not observed. Conclusions: We suggest that PZA-proliposomes are potential candidates for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available