4.7 Article

Evaluation of biosafety and intracellular uptake of Cremophor EL free paclitaxel elastic liposomal formulation

Journal

DRUG DELIVERY
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 11-20

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2011.621990

Keywords

Paclitaxel; elastic liposomes; cytotoxicity; single and repeated dose toxicity studies; intracellular uptake

Funding

  1. ICMR, New Delhi, India [45/26/2008/PHA/BMS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study examines the acute, sub-acute toxicity, and cytotoxicity of paclitaxel elastic liposomal formulation in comparison to a marketed Cremophor EL (polyoxyethylated castor oil): ethanol (1:1, v/v) based formulation. In the previous study, Cremophor EL free paclitaxel elastic liposomal formulation was developed and characterized. Cytotoxicity of formulation was evaluated by MTT assay using A549 cell lines. Percentage intracellular uptake of paclitaxel elastic liposomal and marketed formulation was determined using a fluorescence activating cell sorting assay (FACS) and fluorescence microscopy techniques. Single and repeated dose toxicity measurement showed no mortality, hematological, biochemical, or histopathological changes up to a dose of 120 mg/kg for paclitaxel elastic liposomal formulation, in comparison the marketed formulation showed toxicity at a dose of 40 mg/kg. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for paclitaxel elastic liposomal and marketed formulation was found to be 160 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg, respectively. Results of FACS analysis showed a 94.6 +/- 2.5% intracellular uptake of fluorescence marker acridine orange (AO) loaded in elastic liposomes; in comparison the AO solution showed only a 19.8 +/- 1.1% uptake. Paclitaxel elastic liposomal formulation seems to be a better alternative for safe and effective delivery of paclitaxel. This study proves the safety and higher intracellular uptake of paclitaxel elastic liposomal formulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available