4.7 Article

Nasal and rectal delivery of insulin with chitosan and N-trimethyl chitosan chloride

Journal

DRUG DELIVERY
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 399-407

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10717541003762888

Keywords

N-trimethyl chitosan chloride; chitosan; absorption enhancer; paracellular transport; nasal route; rectal route

Funding

  1. South African Druggist Group
  2. ELI Lilly Company, South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of TMC, with different degrees of quaternization, to increase insulin absorption in vivo following nasal and rectal administration in rats. Two batches of TMC with different degrees of quaternization (TMC-L, 12.3% quaternized and TMC-H, 61.2% quaternized) and chitosan hydrochloride were administered intranasally (0.25 and 0.5% w/v) and rectally (0.5% w/v) with insulin (4 IU/kg body weight), at a pH of 4.40 and 7.40, in rats. Blood samples were taken over a period of 2 h for measurement of blood glucose levels and plasma insulin levels. Local toxicity evaluation was done by histological examination of the nasal and rectal epithelia. At pH 4.40 all these polymers were able to increase nasal and rectal insulin absorption, compared to the control groups. However, at a pH of 7.40, only TMC-H was able to increase the nasal and rectal absorption of insulin. These results relate to the insolubility of chitosan hydrochloride at neutral pH values, while the charge density of TMC-L is still too low for any significant interaction at pH 7.40. Histological evaluation of the nasal and rectal eptihelia shows no changes in the morphology of the cells after exposure to these polymers. Only slight congestion of the nasal submucosa was observed and all these polymers led to a mild increase in mucus secretion at pH 4.40. Highly quaternized TMC proves to be a potent absorption enhancer in vivo, especially at neutral pH values where chitosan salts are ineffective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available