4.4 Article

Integration of health services improves multiple healthcare outcomes among HIV-infected people who inject drugs in Ukraine

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 106-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.09.020

Keywords

HIV/AIDS; Substance abuse; Quality healthcare indicators; Opioid substitution therapy; Health services delivery; International health; Integrated healthcare; Methadone; Buprenorphine

Funding

  1. National Institutes on Drug Abuse [K24 DA0170720, R01 DA029910, R01 DA33679]
  2. National Institutes of Health Medical Science Training Program [GM07205]
  3. International HIV/AIDS Alliance (Ukraine)
  4. Open Society Institute
  5. World Health Organization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) experience poor outcomes and fuel HIV epidemics in middleincome countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. We assess integrated/co-located (ICL) healthcare for HIV-infected PWID, which despite international recommendations, is neither widely available nor empirically examined. Methods:A 2010 cross-sectional study randomly sampled 296 HIV-infected opioid-dependent PWID from two representative HIV-endemic regions in Ukraine where ICL, non-co-located (NCL) and harm reduction/outreach (HRO) settings are available. ICL settings provide onsite HIV, addiction, and tuberculosis services, NCLs only treat addiction, and HROs provide counseling, needles/syringes, and referrals, but no opioid substitution therapy (OST). The primary outcome was receipt of quality healthcare, measured using a quality healthcare indicator (QHI) composite score representing percentage of eight guidelines-based recommended indicators Met for HIV, addiction and tuberculosis treatment. The secondary outcomes were individual QHIs and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). Results: On average, ICL-participants had significantly higher QHI composite scores compared to NCL- and HRO-participants (71.9% versus 54.8% versus 37.0%, p<0.001) even after controlling for potential confounders. Compared to NCL-participants, ICL-participants were significantly more likely to receive antiretroviral therapy (49.5% versus 19.2%,p<0.001), especially if CD4< 200(93.8% versus 62.5% p<0.05); guideline-recommended OST dosage (57.3% versus 41.4%, p<0.05); and isoniazid preventive therapy (423% versus 11.2%, p<0.001). Subjects receiving OST had significantly higher HRQoL than those not receiving it (p<0.001); however, HRQoL did not differ significantly between ICL- and NCL-participants. Conclusions: These findings suggest that OST alone improves quality-of-life, while receiving care in integrated settings collectively and individually improves healthcare quality indicators for PWID. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available