4.4 Review

Mortality among cocaine users: A systematic review of cohort studies

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 113, Issue 2-3, Pages 88-95

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.026

Keywords

Cocaine; Mortality; Review; Dependence; Cohort

Funding

  1. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Australia
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC) Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To conduct a systematic review of mortality among cohort studies of cocaine users. Methods: Three electronic databases were searched (EMBASE, Medline and PsychINFO); other online databases were searched using online libraries and repositories of reports and literature in the drug and alcohol field, with requested contributions from trained librarians and experts. Searches and extraction were undertaken using protocols and cross-checking of decisions by two authors. Additional data were requested from study investigators where studies did not report relevant data. Results: 1911 articles and 2 reports were identified from searches, with data from another four studies located from review articles. Seven cohorts of problem or dependent cocaine users reported data that permitted mortality rates to be estimated. Crude mortality rates ranged from 0.53 (95% CI: 0.10-1.58) to 6.16 (95% CI: 5.21-7.11) per 100PY. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) reported in four studies suggested that mortality was four to eight times higher among cocaine users than age and sex peers in the general population. Conclusions: There are limited data on the extent of elevated mortality among problematic or dependent cocaine users and it is unclear how generalisable the results of these studies may be to other populations of problematic cocaine users. Greater attention to both the method of recruitment, and the characteristics of cocaine users, would enhance our understanding of the mortality risks of problematic cocaine use. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available