4.4 Review

The use of neuroproteomics in drug abuse research

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 11-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.10.001

Keywords

Proteomics; Neuroproteomics; Drug abuse; Proteome fractionation; Bioinformatics; Sample quality

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA016613, R01AA016613-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [F31 DA022819-03, R01DA013770-08, F31-DA02281902, R01 DA013770] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of discovery proteomic studies of drug abuse has begun to increase in recent years, facilitated by the adoption of new techniques such as 2D-DIGE and iTRAQ. For these new tools to provide the greatest insight into the neurobiology of addiction, however, it is important that the addiction field has a clear understanding of the strengths, limitations, and drug abuse-specific research factors of neuroproteomic studies. This review outlines approaches for improving animal models, protein sample quality and stability, proteome fractionation, data analysis, and data sharing to maximize the insights gained from neuroproteomic studies of drug abuse. For both the behavioral researcher interested in what proteomic study results mean, and for biochemists joining the drug abuse research field, a careful consideration of these factors is needed. Similar to genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic methods, appropriate use of new proteomic technologies offers the potential to provide a novel and global view of the neurobiological changes underlying drug addiction. Proteomic tools play be an enabling technology to identify key proteins involved in drug abuse behaviors, with the ultimate goal of understanding the etiology of drug abuse and identifying targets for the development of therapeutic agents. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available