4.4 Article

Geographical clustering of cannabis use: Results from the New Zealand Mental Health Survey 2003-2004

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 99, Issue 1-3, Pages 309-316

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.002

Keywords

Cannabis; Marijuana; Epidemiology; New Zealand; Alternating logistic regression; Spatial clustering

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Alcohol Advisory Council and Health Research Council of New Zealand
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [K05DA015799, R01DA016559]
  3. United States National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH070884]
  4. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  5. Pfizer Foundation
  6. US Public Health Service [R13-MH066849, R01-MH069864, R01 DA016558]
  7. Fogarty International Center [FIRCA R01-TW006481]
  8. Pan American Health Organization
  9. Eli Lilly and Company
  10. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  11. GlaxoSmith Kline
  12. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  13. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R13MH066849, R01MH069864, R01MH070884] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  14. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA016558, K05DA015799] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In epidemiology, it always has been important to study local area patterns of disease occurrence. New methods to quantify local area and household clustering of disease emerged late in the 19th Century and were refined during the 20th century. Nonetheless, multi-level models to estimate local area clustering of illegal drug use did not appear until the 1990s, and to date, there is just one study with estimates of local neighbourhood clustering of cannabis use, based on a United States sample. Here, seeking the first replication of that single prior study. We estimate the degree to which cannabis use might cluster within neighbours of New Zealand (NZ), and we also study higher level clustering and suspected individual-level determinants of recent cannabis use. Methods: A national probability community sample (n=12,992) of adults aged 16 years or more with standardized assessment of cannabis use. Alternating logistic regression produced estimates for cannabis clustering. Results: In NZ, use of cannabis was common: 41.6% had ever used it and 13.1% had used it in the past year. There was clustering within the smallest local areas (pairwise odds ratio = 1.3-1.5) but not within larger government districts (PWOR = 1.02). Age, male sex, ethnicity, education, and marital status were all associated with cannabis use, but did not account for observed clustering. Conclusions: Neighborhood clustering of recent cannabis use has emerged in New Zealand, as in the US. Standard individual-level characteristics explain only some of this clustering. Other explanations must be sought, perhaps including personal networks and local supply. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available