4.4 Article

Promoting abstinence from cocaine and heroin with a methadone dose increase and a novel contingency

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 101, Issue 1-2, Pages 92-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.11.006

Keywords

Contingency management; Polydrug dependence; Methadone dose; DSM diagnoses

Funding

  1. NIDA IRP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To test whether a combination of contingency management and methadone dose increase would promote abstinence from heroin and cocaine, we conducted a randomized controlled trial using a 2 x 3 (dose x contingency) factorial design in which dose assignment was double-blind. Participants were 252 heroin- and cocaine-abusing outpatients on methadone maintenance. The were randomly assigned to methadone dose (70 or 100 mg/day, double-blind) and voucher condition (noncontingent, contingent on cocaine-negative urines, or split). The split contingency was a novel contingency that reinforced abstinence from either drug while doubly reinforcing simultaneous abstinence from both: the total value of incentives was split between drugs to contain costs. The main outcome measures were percentages of urine specimens negative for heroin. cocaine, and both simultaneously; these were monitored during a 5-week baseline of standard treatment (to determine Study eligibility), a 12-week intervention, and a 10-week maintenance phase (to examine intervention effects in return-to-baseline conditions). DSM-IV criteria for ongoing drug dependence were assessed at study exit. Urine-screen results showed that the methadone dose increase reduced heroin use but not cocaine use. The split 100 mg group was the only group to achieve a longer duration of simultaneous negatives than its same-dose noncontingent control group. The frequency of DSM-IV opiate and cocaine dependence diagnoses decreased in the active intervention groups. For a split contingency to promote simultaneous abstinence from cocaine and heroin, a relatively high dose of methadone appears necessary but not sufficient; an increase in overall incentive amount may also be required. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available