4.4 Article

Safety, tolerability and subject-rated effects of acute intranasal cocaine administration during atomoxetine maintenance

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 92, Issue 1-3, Pages 282-285

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.005

Keywords

humans; physiological effects; pharmacotherapy; atomoxetine; cocaine

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01RR02602] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA021155-02, R01 DA021155, R01 DA 021 155] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR002602] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA021155] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results of recent research indicate that agonist replacement may be a viable option in the treatment of cocaine dependence. For example, D-amphetamine and modafinil have shown promise in managing cocaine dependence in preliminary clinical trials. The aim of this study was to determine the physiological and subject-rated effects of acute intranasal cocaine doses during chronic atomoxetine treatment. Atomoxetine was chosen because it produces pharmacological and subject-rated effects similar to those of prototypical stimulants and thus may also be a viable agonist replacement therapy. To this end, seven cocaine-dependent subjects were maintained on doses of atomoxetine (0 mg [lead in], 5, 10, 20 and 0 mg [washout], four times daily) for 3-5 days prior to completing experimental sessions in which ascending doses of intranasal cocaine (4, 20, 40 and 60 mg) were administered. Cocaine produced prototypical cardiovascular and subject-rated effects. Atomoxetine attenuated the systolic pressure increasing effects and enhanced the heart rate increasing effects of cocaine, but was otherwise devoid of effects. These results indicate that cocaine is well tolerated during atomoxetine maintenance. Further research is needed to better determine the effects of atomoxetine and cocaine combinations. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available