4.6 Article

Effect of light irradiation on the photoelectricity performance of microbial fuel cell with a copper oxide nanowire photocathode

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.12.003

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell; Photocatalysis; Electrochemistry; Energy; Anaerobic

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CUSF-DH-D-2014047]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477018, 21007010]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new way to enhance the performance of a microbial fuel cell (MFC) using photoelectricity was studied. The effect of light irradiation on the photoelectricity performance of a MFC with CuO nanowire-arrayed photocathode was investigated. The MFC produced a maximum power density of 46A4 mW m(-2) under light irradiation, 125% increase compared to 36.99 mW m(-2) in the dark. The open circuit voltage (Vocv) of the MFC was 466 mV under light irradiation, which increased by 113% compared to 412 mV in the dark. The linear sweep voltammogram (LSV) of the MFC cathode proved that the CuO cathode current was higher under light illumination than in the dark. The electrochemical impedance spectrum of the CuO cathode was lower under light irradiation conditions than in the dark. The results show that the R-ct and R-Omega of the CuO cathode under light irradiation decreased from 179.9 and 7.92 Omega to 138.6 and 2.04 Omega, respectively. The resistance of the photoelectrode decreased and the cathode potential increased, thus increasing the MFC power. The cathodes made of semiconductor materials such as copper oxide nanowires were used for the first time in MFC, which cooperated with the solar and biomass energy in MFC. The study provided a new insight into the biological energy coupling with solar energy and provided exciting opportunities for the unique study in semiconductor and MFC. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available