4.5 Article

Gene Capture Coupled to High-Throughput Sequencing as a Strategy for Targeted Metagenome Exploration

Journal

DNA RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 185-196

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dst001

Keywords

alpha-subunit of the methyl-coenzyme M reductase; metagenomics; sequence capture; 454 pyrosequencing; microbial diversity

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-EBIO-009]
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) [163588]
  3. Region Auvergne
  4. Direction Generale de l'Armement (DGA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows faster acquisition of metagenomic data, but complete exploration of complex ecosystems is hindered by the extraordinary diversity of microorganisms. To reduce the environmental complexity, we created an innovative solution hybrid selection (SHS) method that is combined with NGS to characterize large DNA fragments harbouring biomarkers of interest. The quality of enrichment was evaluated after fragments containing the methyl coenzyme M reductase subunit A gene (mcrA), the biomarker of methanogenesis, were captured from a Methanosarcina strain and a metagenomic sample from a meromictic lake. The methanogen diversity was compared with direct metagenome and mcrA-based amplicon pyrosequencing strategies. The SHS approach resulted in the capture of DNA fragments up to 2.5 kb with an enrichment efficiency between 41 and 100%, depending on the sample complexity. Compared with direct metagenome and amplicons sequencing, SHS detected broader mcrA diversity, and it allowed efficient sampling of the rare biosphere and unknown sequences. In contrast to amplicon-based strategies, SHS is less biased and GC independent, and it recovered complete biomarker sequences in addition to conserved regions. Because this method can also isolate the regions flanking the target sequences, it could facilitate operon reconstructions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available