4.3 Article

Genetic variation in DNA repair pathway genes and melanoma risk

Journal

DNA REPAIR
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 111-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.08.005

Keywords

DNA repair; Melanoma; Etiology; Polymorphism

Funding

  1. NIH [CA122838]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [U54 RR020278-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reduced DNA repair capacity has been proposed as a predisposing factor for melanoma. We comprehensively evaluated 1463 genetic variants across 60 DNA repair-related pathway genes in relation to melanoma risk in a nested case-control study of 218 melanoma cases (20% on head and neck) and 218 matched controls within the Nurses' Health Study (NHS). We then genotyped the two variants with the smallest P value in two replication sets: 184 melanoma cases (28% on head and neck) and 184 matched controls in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS); and 183 melanoma cases (10% on head and neck) and 183 matched controls in the NHS. The SNP rs3219125 in the PARP1 gene was significantly associated with melanoma risk in the discovery set (odds ratio (OR) 3.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70-5.80) and in the HPFS replication set (OR, 1.92: 95% CI. 1.05-3.54) but not in the NHS replication set (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.58-1.97). In the joint analysis, the OR was 1.89 (95% CI. 1.34-2.68) for this polymorphism, and this increased risk was more pronounced among patients with lesions in head/neck (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.77-5.73 for head/neck, and OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.30 for other sites, P value for heterogeneity test=0.036). Our findings suggest the possible involvement of the PARP1 variant in melanoma development, especially for sites with high sun exposure. Further work on fine-mapping and on the functional characterization of this and linked SNPs in this region is required. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available