4.3 Article

Mrc1, Tof1 and Csm3 inhibit CAG.CTG repeat instability by at least two mechanisms

Journal

DNA REPAIR
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 633-640

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.01.009

Keywords

trinucleotide repeat; expansion; checkpoint; DNA damage response; replicational coupling

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA036727, T32 CA09476, T32 CA009476, P30 CA36727] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM061961-07, R01 GM061961, GM61961] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trinucleotide repeats frequently expand and contract in humans and model organisms. Protein factors that modulate this process have been found by candidate gene approaches or mutant screens for increased expansion rates. To extend this effort, Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with higher CAG.CTG repeat contraction rates were sought using a disruption library. This screen identified Mrc1, the homolog of human Claspin, which mediates the replication and DNA damage checkpoints, and also couples the replicative helicase and polymerase. Genetic analysis showed that Mrc1, along with Tof1 and Csm3, inhibits instability in two distinct ways. Contraction rates Of (CAG)(20) tracts are elevated by loss of Mrc1, Tof1 or Csm3, but not by defects in most replication checkpoint or DNA damage checkpoint proteins. The three proteins likely inhibit contractions primarily through their coupling activity, which would prevent accumulation of single-strand template DNA prior to the formation of aberrant secondary structure. In contrast, expansion rates of (CTG)(13) are elevated in strains defective for Mrc1, Tof1, Csm3, Mec1, Ddc2, Rad24, Ddc1, Mec3, Rad17, Rad9, Rac53 or Chk1, suggesting that the DNA damage checkpoint inhibits expansions after formation of repeat-dependent structures. Together, these results indicate that at least two Mrc1-dependent mechanisms function to reduce CAG.CTG repeat instability. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available