4.3 Article

Mouse but not human embryonic stem cells are deficient in rejoining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks

Journal

DNA REPAIR
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 1471-1483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.05.005

Keywords

mouse embryonic stem cells; double-strand break repair; gamma H2AX; DNA-PK

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of Canada
  2. Canadian Cancer Society
  3. Canadian Stem Cell Network
  4. StemCell Technologies Inc
  5. CIHR Industrial Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells will give rise to all of the cells of the adult mouse, but they failed to rejoin half of the DNA double-strand breaks (dsb) produced by high doses of ionizing radiation. A deficiency in DNA-PKCS appears to be responsible since mES cells expressed < 10% of the level of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) although Ku70/80 protein levels were higher than MEFs. However, the low level of DNA-PKCS found in wild-type cells appeared sufficient to allow rejoining of dsb after doses < 20 Gy even in G1 phase cells. Inhibition of DNA-PKCS with wortmannin and NU7026 still sensitized mES cells to radiation confirming the importance of the residual DNA-PKCS at low doses. In contrast to wild-type cells, mES cells lacking H2AX, a histone protein involved in the DNA damage response, were radiosensitive but they rejoined double-strand breaks more rapidly. Consistent with more rapid dsb rejoining, H2AX(-/-) mES cells also expressed 6 times more DNA-PKCS than wild-type mES cells. Similar results were obtained for ATM(-/-) mES cells. Differentiation of mES cells led to an increase in DNA-PKCS an increase in dsb rejoining rate, and a decrease in Ku70/80. Unlike mouse ES, human ES cells were proficient in rejoining of dsb and expressed high levels of DNA-PKCS These results confirm the importance of homologous recombination in the accurate repair of double-strand breaks in mES cells, they help explain the chromosome abnormalities associated with deficiencies in H2AX and ATM, and they add to the growing list of differences in the way rodent and human cells deal with DNA damage. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available