4.6 Article

Molecular Characterization, Expression Patterns, and Polymorphism of a Differentially Expressed Porcine Gene (PYGM) Isolated by Suppression Subtractive Hybridization and Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis Analysis

Journal

DNA AND CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 98-105

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dna.2011.1295

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Foundation Research and Development of China [2006CB102102]
  2. Key and Specific National Project for Creating New Biological Species Transgenic Ally
  3. Foundation and Frontier Technology Programs of Henan province [092300410010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Suppression subtractive hybridization was performed to detect the differences in gene expression of porcine longissimus dorsi muscles between Large White and Chinese Meishan pigs. An upregulated gene in Large White that shared high homology with human muscle glycogen phosphorylase (PYGM) was identified. The porcine PYGM gene contains an open reading frame encoding 842 amino acid residues with 26 and 283 nucleotides in the 5' and 3' untranslated regions, respectively. Tissue distribution analysis indicated that porcine PYGM mRNAs are highly expressed in all tissues. Expression pattern of PYGM was similar in the two breeds. Both breeds had the highest expression levels when 120 days old (p < 0.01), and PYGM was upregulated during skeletal muscle development. A similar expression pattern of PYGM in protein level was also observed by differential proteome analysis of skeletal muscle development using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectroscopy. The mRNA abundance of PYGM in Large White was higher than Meishan at all four stages (p < 0.05). Moreover, a G/T mutation in exon 8 was identified and association analysis with meat quality traits showed that it was significantly associated with lean meat percentage (p < 0.05). Our data may provide further insight into the molecular mechanisms responsible for breed-specific differences in porcine growth and meat quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available