4.2 Article

A new framework for generalized Besov-type and Triebel-Lizorkin-type spaces

Journal

DISSERTATIONES MATHEMATICAE
Volume -, Issue 489, Pages 1-114

Publisher

POLISH ACAD SCIENCES INST MATHEMATICS-IMPAN
DOI: 10.4064/dm489-0-1

Keywords

Besov space; Triebel-Lizorkin space; atom; molecule; difference; oscillation; wavelet; embedding; multiplier; pseudo-differential operator

Categories

Funding

  1. GCOE program of Kyoto University
  2. China Scholarship Council [LiuJinOu [2010]6066]
  3. German Academic Exchange Service (PPP) [[2010]6066]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21740104]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11171027, 11101038]
  6. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120003110003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the authors propose a new framework under which a theory of generalized Besov-type and Triebel-Lizorkin-type function spaces is developed. Many function spaces appearing in harmonic analysis fall under the scope of this new framework. The boundedness of the Hardy Littlewood maximal operator or the related vector-valued maximal function on any of these function spaces is not required to construct these generalized scales of smoothness spaces. Instead, a key idea used is an application of the Peetre maximal function. This idea originates from recent findings in the abstract coorbit.space theory obtained by Holger Rauhut and Tino Ullrich. In this new setting, the authors establish the boundedness of pseudo-differential operators based on atomic and molecular characterizations and also the boundedness of Fourier multipliers. Characterizations of these function spaces by means of differences and oscillations are also established. As further applications of this new framework, the authors reexamine and polish some existing results for many different scales of function spaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available