4.1 Review

Protein alterations in ESCC and clinical implications: a review

Journal

DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 9-20

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00845.x

Keywords

biomarkers; esophageal squamous carcinoma; prognosis

Funding

  1. Chinese Hi-Tech RD Program [2006AA02A403]
  2. State Key Basic Research Grant of China [2004CB518705]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20060023003, 20050023046]
  4. National Science Fund for Creative Research Groups [30721001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant histological subtype of esophageal cancer in Asia, characterized by high incidence and mortality rate. Although significant progress has been made in surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the prognosis of the patients with this cancer still remains poor. Investigation into protein alterations that occurred in tumors can provide clues to discover new biomarkers for improving diagnosis and guiding targeted therapy. Hundreds of papers have appeared over the past several decades concerning protein alterations in ESCC. This review summarizes all the dysregulated proteins investigated in the disease from 187 published papers and analyzes their contributions to tumor development and progression. We document protein alterations associated with tumor metastasis and the transition from normal esophageal epithelia to dysplasia in order to reveal the most useful markers for prediction of clinical outcome, early detection, and identification of high-risk patients for targeted therapies. In particluar, we discuss the largest and most rigorous studies on prognostic implications of proteins in ESCC, in which cyclin D1, p53, E-cadherin and VEGF appeared to have the strongest evidence as independent predictors of patient outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available