4.5 Article

The Accuracy of a Postprocessing Technique-Volume Render Mode-in Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasonography of Anal Abscesses and Fistulas

Journal

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 238-244

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ff44de

Keywords

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography; Volume render mode; Anal abscess; Fistula-in-ano

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a 3-dimensional volume render mode endoanal ultrasonography in the assessment of anal abscesses and fistulas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography was performed preoperatively in 62 patients with clinical diagnoses of an anal abscess and/or an anal fistula. The accuracy of a volume render mode endoanal ultrasonography was evaluated blindly by 2 observers through a retrospective analysis of all the stored images of anal abscesses and fistulas. Differences in classification of the type of anal abscesses and in determination of the type and location of internal openings of anal fistulas were assessed. RESULTS: In classification of the primary tract, the agreement between the volume render mode endoanal ultrasonography and surgery was much higher than that for the 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (marginal homogeneity test P > .1, kappa = 0.96, and marginal homogeneity test P = .0048, kappa = 0.28, respectively). In localizing the internal openings and in classifying anal abscesses, the agreement for both methods with surgery was identical. The interobserver agreement showed complete agreement (100%) with regard to luminance and thickness parameters and very high accuracy for the opacity and filter parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that volume render mode endoanal ultrasonography is a useful adjunct method to the 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography, showing better classification results of the types of anal fistulas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available