4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Determining Levels of Fecal Incontinence in the Community: A New Zealand Cross-Sectional Study

Journal

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
Volume 54, Issue 11, Pages 1381-1387

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822dd0f0

Keywords

Cross-sectional studies; Fecal incontinence/diagnosis; Fecal incontinence/epidemiology; Health surveys; Prevalence; Quality of life; Questionnaires

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a socially stigmatized condition, and its prevalence in the community has been problematic to quantify because of difficulty with its definition. OBJECTIVE: This study estimates the community prevalence of fecal incontinence in New Zealand by 3 scales of measurement: patient perceptions of a problem with bowel control, their symptoms, and their quality of life. DESIGN/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A postal survey of 2000 people, aged >18, randomly selected from the national electoral roll, was performed. This used a validated, reliability-tested, anonymous questionnaire, the Comprehensive Fecal Incontinence Questionnaire, incorporating the identification of a problem with bowel control, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. RESULTS: The response rate was 68.7%. A total of 14.7% (95% CI: 12.6-16.7) of participants felt they had a problem with bowel control and 12.4% (95% CI: 10.5-14.5) had fecal incontinence when defined using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index table as leakage of liquid or solid stool >= 1/month. In terms of quality of life, 26.8% of the population (95% CI: 24.2-29.4) noted some impairment on the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. In total, 155 (13.2%) participants reported at least 2 of the 3 possible diagnostic measures, and this may provide a way to incorporate the 3 measures into a new definition of fecal incontinence. LIMITATIONS: This study incorporated a new generic question enquiring about an individual's perception of a bowel control problem and also introduced a cutoff value for Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale to attempt to identify those with any impairment due to accidental bowel leakage. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to highlight some of the challenges involved with suitably identifying those who have fecal incontinence within the community. The prevalence rate of 13.2% represents a realistic measure of the burden of fecal incontinence in the general population, and further research in this area is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available