4.5 Article

Robotic Cylindrical Abdominoperineal Resection With Transabdominal Levator Transection

Journal

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
Volume 54, Issue 10, Pages 1320-1325

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822720a2

Keywords

Robotic surgery; da Vinci robot; Total mesorectal excision; Rectal cancer; Abdominoperineal resection; Cylindrical abdominoperineal resection

Funding

  1. Intuitive Surgical
  2. Ethicon and Covidien

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: The extralevator approach to abdominoperineal resection is an emerging surgical option for patients with low rectal cancer. This technique involves a wide excision of the levator muscles that could reduce the high incidence of circumferential margin positivity associated with conventional abdominoperineal resections. We present our technique of robotic cylindrical abdominoperineal resection where the daVinci robot is used to perform a controlled transection of the levator muscles transabdominally under direct visualization. METHODS: Five patients with rectal adenocarcinoma within 5 cm of the anal verge underwent robot-assisted cylindrical abdominoperineal resection. Safety, feasibility, immediate postoperative outcomes, and pathological adequacy of the specimen were assessed. RESULTS: The procedure was successfully completed in all 5 patients without any intraoperative complications, robot-associated morbidity, or conversion to the open approach. The mean operative time and length of hospital stay were 343 minutes and 5.8 days. An intact mesorectal envelope and negative circumferential margin was achieved in all cases. All specimens had a cylindrical shape. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assistance enables the transabdominal transection of the levator muscles in cylindrical abdominoperineal resection, with acceptable perioperative and pathological outcomes. Further studies are essential to objectively define the safety, efficacy, and long-term results of this new technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available