Journal
DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 171-173Publisher
COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.015123
Keywords
Negative findings; Negative results; Null hypothesis
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so. - Mark Twain. Science is often romanticised as a flawless system of knowledge building, where scientists work together to systematically find answers. In reality, this is not always the case. Dissemination of results are straightforward when the findings are positive, but what happens when you obtain results that support the null hypothesis, or do not fit with the current scientific thinking? In this Editorial, we discuss the issues surrounding publication bias and the difficulty in communicating negative results. Negative findings are a valuable component of the scientific literature because they force us to critically evaluate and validate our current thinking, and fundamentally move us towards unabridged science.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available