4.5 Article

A strategy for the generation, characterization and distribution of animal models by The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

Journal

DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 1316-1324

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.011940

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Progress in Parkinson's disease (PD) research and therapeutic development is hindered by many challenges, including a need for robust preclinical animal models. Limited availability of these tools is due to technical hurdles, patent issues,, licensing restrictions and the high costs associated with generating and distributing these animal models. Furthermore, the lack of standardization of phenotypic characterization and use of varying methodologies has made it difficult to compare; outcome measures across laboratories. In response, The Michael J, Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (MJFF) is directly sponsoring the generation, characterization and distribution of preclinical rodent models, enabling increased access to these crucial tools in order to accelerate PD research. To date, MJFF has initiated and funded the generation of 30 different models, which include transgenic or knockout Models of PD-relevant genes such as Park1 (also known as Park4 and SNCA), Park8 (LRRK2); Park7 (DJ-1), Park6 (PINK1), Park2 (Parkin), VPS35, EiF4G1 and GM. The phenotypic characterization of these animals is performed in a Uniform and streamlined manner at independent contract research organizations. Finally, MJFF created a central repository at The Jackson Laboratory (JAX) that houses both non-MJFF and MJFF-generated preclinical animal models. Funding from MJFF, which subsidizes the costs involved in transfer, rederivation and colony expansion, has directly resulted in over 2500 rodents being distributed to the PD community for research use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available