4.5 Article

Endogenous ribosomal protein L29 (RPL29): a newly identified regulator of angiogenesis in mice

Journal

DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 115-124

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.009183

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Breast Cancer Campaign [BCC 2008 MayPR07]
  2. Cancer Research UK [CRUK C8212_A12007]
  3. National Institutes of Health [P20-RR016458]
  4. CRUK
  5. MRC [G0901609] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Cancer Research UK [12007] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [1365527, G0901609] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Worldwide Cancer Research [12-1068] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P20RR016458] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellular ribosomal protein L29 (RPL29) is known to be important in protein synthesis, but its function during angiogenesis has never been described before. We have shown previously that mice lacking. 3-integrins support enhanced tumour angiogenesis and, therefore, deletion of endothelial. v. 3 can provide a method for discovery of novel regulators of tumour angiogenesis. Here, we describe significant upregulation of RPL29 in beta 3-null endothelial cells at both the mRNA and protein level. Ex vivo, we show that VEGF-stimulated microvessel sprouting was reduced significantly in Rpl29-heterozygous and Rpl29-null aortic ring assays compared with wild-type controls. Moreover, we provide in vivo evidence that RPL29 can regulate tumour angiogenesis. Tumour blood vessel density in subcutaneously grown Lewis lung carcinomas was reduced significantly in Rpl29-mutant mice. Additionally, depletion of Rpl29 using RNA interference inhibited VEGF-induced aortic ring sprouting, suggesting that anti-RPL29 strategies might have anti-angiogenic potential. Overall, our results identify that loss or depletion of RPL29 can reduce angiogenesis in vivo and ex vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available