4.2 Article

Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating miR-221 for extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

Journal

DISEASE MARKERS
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 251-258

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2010/474692

Keywords

microRNA; NK/T-cell lymphoma; prognosis; quantitative real-time PCR

Funding

  1. Nature Science foundation of Guangdong Province [05200178]
  2. Research Fund for the Dectoral Program of Higher Education [200805580080]
  3. Scientific and Technological Planning of Guangzhou City, China [2006Z3-E0021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extra-nodal natural killer T-Cell (NK/T-cell) lymphoma is a progressive cancer with poor prognosis due to the lack of disease specific treatment. To develop specific therapeutic strategies, it is essential to identify tumor markers. Recent studies show that circulating microRNA (miRNA) may serve as diagnostic and/or prognostic markers for some diseases. To explore miRNAs as potential diagnostic and/or prognostic markers of NK/T-cell lymphoma, in our study, we compared circulating miR-221 levels in 79 patients and 37 normal subjects by real-time PCR amplification directly from plasma samples, and correlated patient's miR-221 levels with their clinic features and treatment outcomes. We observed a significant difference between the patient and control groups (p = 0.038), and a correlation of plasma miR-221 level in patient with sex, as well as a reverse correlation with performance status and the overall survival after treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses further revealed that plasma miR-221 level, age, B symptoms, LDH level and complete response after primary treatment all present prognostic values when judged by overall survival (OS). Together, our results show that it is feasible to perform direct amplification of plasma miRNAs without total RNA extraction, and plasma miR-221 may be a diagnostic and prognostic marker for NK/T-cell lymphoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available