4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

The concert queueing game: to wait or to be late

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10626-010-0097-0

Keywords

Queueing; Nash equilibrium; Fluid limit; Price of anarchy

Funding

  1. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  2. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [0954116] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [0917410] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce the concert (or cafeteria) queueing problem: A finite but large number of customers arrive into a queueing system that starts service at a specified opening time. Each customer is free to choose her arrival time (before or after opening time), and is interested in early service completion with minimal wait. These goals are captured by a cost function which is additive and linear in the waiting time and service completion time, with coefficients that may be class dependent. We consider a fluid model of this system, which is motivated as the fluid-scale limit of the stochastic system. In the fluid setting, we explicitly identify the unique Nash-equilibrium arrival profile for each class of customers. Our structural results imply that, in equilibrium, the arrival rate is increasing up until the closing time where all customers are served. Furthermore, the waiting queue is maximal at the opening time, and monotonically decreases thereafter. In the simple single class setting, we show that the price of anarchy (PoA, the efficiency loss relative to the socially optimal solution) is exactly two, while in the multi-class setting we develop tight upper and lower bounds on the PoA. In addition, we consider several mechanisms that may be used to reduce the PoA. The proposed model may explain queueing phenomena in diverse settings that involve a pre-assigned opening time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available