4.4 Article

Impact of first-ever mild stroke on participation at 3 and 6 month post-event: the TABASCO study

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 667-673

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.923523

Keywords

Cognition; community reintegration; executive functions; participation; quality of life; stroke

Categories

Funding

  1. Ono Academic College, Israel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study focused on the relationships between cognition, participation and quality of life (QoL) among first-ever mild ischemic stroke patients 3 months post-event. We hypothesized that significant correlations exist between cognition, executive functions (EF), QoL and participation; and that EF and QoL will significantly contribute to participation beyond demographics and stroke severity at 3 and from 3 to 6 months post-stroke. Methods: A prospective cohort study, recruiting consecutive first-ever stroke patients from a large tertiary hospital. The inclusion criteria were first event, mild stroke (NIHSS <= 5), and no previous significant neurological or cognitive impairment. In addition to assessment every 6 month at the hospital, an assessment battery was administered at home 3 months post-stroke. Results: Participants showed mild to moderate difficulties in cognition and participation (n = 249). Low to moderate correlations were found between cognition and EF with participation (-0.380, p<0.05; r = 0.460, p<0.001, respectively); and cognition with QoL (r = 0.421, p50.001). EF and QoL contributed significantly to participation at 3 months (R-2 = 0.961) and in addition education at 6 months (R-2 = 0.701). Conclusions: Participants after mild ischemic stroke experienced cognitive and EF difficulties that affect their participation and QoL. Further studies are needed of mild stroke survivors to enhance our understanding of the variables that affect participation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available