4.4 Review

A narrative review of turning deficits in people with Parkinson's disease

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 37, Issue 14-15, Pages 1382-1389

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.961661

Keywords

Axial; Parkinson's disease; perpendicular; turning

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Southampton
  2. Arthritis UK
  3. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-1010-23336] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Clinically, people with Parkinson's disease (PD) demonstrate a loss of axial rotation of the spine often described as moving enbloc, with little dissociation between the head, trunk and lower limbs whilst turning. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the behaviour and relationship of the reported deficits during whole body turning in people with PD, compared to controls. Better understanding of the relationship and impact of the deficits will permit the development of tailored and novel intervention strategies to improve functional performance in turning for people with PD. Methods: Four electronic databases with the search terms: Parkinson* and turn* were used. Results: Seventy-seven papers were reviewed. Turning deficits in people with PD were identified as originating from two hypothetical body segments - perpendicular (i.e. legs) or axial (i.e. head, trunk and pelvis) segments and the relationship between them discussed. Conclusion: Specific movement deficits in turning in people with PD can be categorised into axial and perpendicular deficits. Synthesis of the literature suggests the possibility of axial deficits driving secondary responses in the perpendicular segments. This should be explored when designing rehabilitation aimed at improving turning performance, as current therapy guidelines focus on exercises emphasising perpendicular aspects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available