4.4 Article

Effectiveness of botulinum toxin injection with and without needle electromyographic guidance for the treatment of spasticity in hemiplegic patients: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 313-318

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.791727

Keywords

Botulinum toxin; electromyographic guidance; hemiplegic patients

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare the effects of botulinum toxin injection with and without needle electromyographic guidance for the treatment of spasticity. Method: A randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary university hospital. Twenty-seven adult hemiplegic patients with spasticity due to brain or spinal cord damage were included. Spastic muscles were injected with botulinum toxin with or without EMG guidance. The modified Ashworth scale and modified Barthel index in each patient pre- and post-injection were documented. Results: In group A, which consisted of 15 patients (55.55%), the injection was administered with needle electromyographic guidance, while in 12 patients (44.44%) of group B without electromyographic guidance with the use of anatomic landmarks only. The follow-up period was 3 months. At 3 weeks post-injection, spasticity was decreased (p < 0.05) in all patients and the mean (SD) reduction of spasticity was higher (p < 0.05) in group A (1.67 (0.5)) than group B (1.25 (0.46)). Similarly, the mean (SD) functional modified Barthel index improved statistically significantly (p < 0.001) post-injection (45.37 (8.43)) than pre-injection (54.07 (9.610), especially in group A (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The effectiveness of intramuscular botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of spasticity in hemiplegic patients is superior when performed with needle electromyographic guidance than without electromyography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available