4.4 Article

From regained function to daily use: experiences of surgical reconstruction of grip in people with tetraplegia

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 36, Issue 8, Pages 678-684

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.808276

Keywords

Daily activity; grip reconstruction; independence; outcome; surgery; tetraplegia

Categories

Funding

  1. Stiftelsen Promobilia, Swedish Research Council [11200]
  2. Goteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To capture patients' relearning processes from regained function to improvements in daily life after grip reconstructive surgery in tetraplegia. Subjects: Eleven people with tetraplegia who underwent grip reconstructive surgery during February 2009 to March 2011. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted 7 to 17 months after surgery and analysed using grounded theory. Results: Determination to reach a higher level of independence was the core concept to integrate regained function into daily life. There were 3 phases identified; Initiate activity training,'' Establish hand control in daily activities,'' and Challenge dependence.'' Between the phases psychological stages occurred, first; a belief in improved ability'', and later in the process; confidence in ability''. The process to fully integrate regain function in daily life was described as long and time-consuming. However, the participants claimed it useful to do the skills training in their home environment, without long-term in clinic rehabilitation. Conclusion: Relearning activities in daily life after a grip reconstruction is a time-consuming and demanding process. It includes skills training, mental strategies and psychological stages together with environmental and social factors. Accordingly, rehabilitation after grip reconstruction in tetraplegia should focus on both grip skills and psychological stages, to encourage that patient's keep their determination and achieve greater independence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available