4.4 Article

Foot placement patterns of female rollator users with multiple sclerosis in the community

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 27-35

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.687028

Keywords

Physical mobility; multiple sclerosis; mobility aids; walking; motor performance

Categories

Funding

  1. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
  2. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in Ontario
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation, Ontario Innovation Trust
  4. Ministry of Research and Innovation
  5. Institute of Aging of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [82640]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between medio-lateral foot placement characteristics and environmental context when individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) walk with a rollator (four-wheeled walker). Method: Ten women diagnosed with MS, who used rollators regularly, participated in this study. First, a rollator-based technique of calculating step width (SW) was validated in this patient population by comparing the output of an instrumented rollator (iWalker) to a laboratory-based Vicon Motion Capture System. Secondly, the iWalker-based technique was used to calculate the participants' SW and SW variability as they used the iWalker in four common outdoor community environments. Results: There was a strong level of agreement between the iWalker and Vicon SW calculations, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.993 and a root-mean-square difference of 0.71 cm. Furthermore, SW variability (P = 0.002), but not SW (P = 0.288), was influenced by the walking environment (i.e. between the in-lab vs. up-ramp and up-ramp vs. down-ramp conditions). Conclusions: Foot placement variability appears to be influenced by the walking environment of MS patients. Therefore, an enhanced understanding of walker-user interactions in relation to the environment must be established in order to improve mobility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available