4.4 Article

Developing an ICF core set for post-stroke disability assessment and verification in Taiwan: a preliminary study

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 34, Issue 15, Pages 1254-1261

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.638033

Keywords

stroke; ICF; disability; classification; cerebrovascular accident; Taiwan

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan [DOH 99M4080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to develop an ICF core set for post-stroke disability assessment and verification of biopsycho-social problems. Method: Using the Delphi method, a consensus process was conducted. In total, 24 multidisciplinary experts from different institutions completed the consensus process. The questionnaire for the study comprised 144 ICF second-level, stroke-relevant categories. A 5-point Likert-type scale was used by participants to weight the impact of each category on activities of daily life after a stroke. Consensus of ratings was assessed with Spearman's rho and semi-interquartile range indices. The core set for post-stroke disability assessment and verification was developed from those categories with a mean score >= 4.0 found in the third round of the Delphi exercise. Results: The core set for post-stroke disability assessment and verification contained 51 categories. Of these, 18 categories were from the component body functions, one from body structures, 22 from activities and participation, and 10 from environmental factors. The mean (standard deviation) Spearman's rho was 0.72 (0.14), and Cronbach's a was 0.98. Conclusions: The preliminary core set for post-stroke disability assessment and verification can offer comprehensive information on the performance of daily-life activities of chronic stroke survivors. Further validation is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available