4.4 Article

Outcomes among older people in a post-acute inpatient rehabilitation unit

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 34, Issue 15, Pages 1333-1338

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.636136

Keywords

Elderly; frail; inpatient rehabilitation unit; physiotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Medicine of the Elderly Department
  2. Centre for Learning and Development in St James's Hospital, Dublin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Designated multidisciplinary rehabilitation units have been shown to provide several benefits for the frail older population. The aim of this research was to evaluate changes in strength, mobility, balance, endurance, frailty and quality of life (QoL) following a 6-week multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation programme. Method: This was a prospective, observational study performed in a post-acute multidisciplinary geriatric inpatient rehabilitation service. A consecutive sample of heterogenous frail older adults (n = 32) participated. Subjects were assessed on admission to the rehabilitation service (T1) and following 6 weeks of rehabilitation (T2). A range of outcome measures were used to assess function and QoL: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Barthel Index (BI), EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), lower limb and grip dynamometry. Results: The majority were female (n = 25), the mean age was 82.9 years (SD 6.35). The median length of stay was 49 days. Patients improved significantly between T1 and T2 assessments in the BBS (p <= 0.0001); TUG (p <= 0.0001); 6MWT (p <= 0.0001); BI (p <= 0.0001); EQ-VAS (p = 0.002); CFS (p <= 0.0001); and in some aspects of grip and lower limb strength. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that positive outcomes occurred in a range of measures in an older, frail inpatient rehabilitation population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available