4.4 Article

Facilitators and barriers of stroke survivors in the early post-stroke phase

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 31, Issue 19, Pages 1584-1591

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638280802639004

Keywords

ICF; facilitators; barriers; stroke

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [K2002-27-VX14318-01A]
  2. Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Foundation
  3. Swedish Association of Persons with Neurological Disabilities ( NHR)
  4. Norrbacka-Eugenia Foundation
  5. Foundation of the Swedish Stroke Association
  6. John and Brit Wennerstrom Foundation of Neurological Research
  7. Vastra Gotalands Handicap Committee
  8. Hjalmar Svensson Foundation
  9. Greta and Einar Asker Foundation
  10. Praktikertjanst AB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. To identify facilitators and barriers among persons with first-ever stroke discharged to the home in the first 3 months post-stroke by means of ICF categories. Method. Stroke survivors were interviewed using semi-structured questions based on the ICF categories of Environmental factors of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Stroke (extended version) at 6 weeks and at 3 months post-stroke. Results. The study sample exists of 67 stroke survivors with an average age of 71 years (51% women). Eleven environmental factors from the ICF chapters 'support and relationship', 'products and technology' and 'services, systems and policies' were experienced to be facilitators and only 'physical geography' was experienced as a barrier by 50% or more of the participants in the study. Conclusions. It was possible to document facilitators and barriers among stroke survivors in a structured way using ICF categories. The high number of experienced facilitators gives an idea of how well stroke care functions in Sweden. There is a great need for further studies examining environmental factors in the post-stroke phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available