4.4 Article

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Plus Peginterferon Alfa-2a: Week 120 Analysis

Journal

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
Volume 63, Issue 12, Pages 3487-3497

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5251-9

Keywords

Chronic hepatitis B; HBsAg seroconversion; HBsAg loss; Virological response

Funding

  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and AimsHepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is the ideal clinical endpoint but is achieved rarely during oral antiviral treatment. A current unmet need in CHB management is achievement of HBsAg loss with a finite course of oral antiviral therapy, thereby allowing discontinuation of treatment. Significantly higher rates of HBsAg loss at 72weeks post-treatment have been demonstrated when tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) was combined with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for 48weeks compared with either monotherapy. This analysis provides follow-up data at week 120.MethodsIn an open-label, active-controlled study, 740 patients with chronic hepatitis B were randomly assigned to receive TDF plus PEG-IFN for 48weeks (group A), TDF plus PEG-IFN for 16weeks followed by TDF for 32weeks (group B), TDF for 120weeks (group C), or PEG-IFN for 48weeks (group D). Efficacy and safety at week 120 were assessed.ResultsRates of HBsAg loss at week 120 were significantly higher in group A (10.4%) than in group B (3.5%), group C (0%), and group D (3.5%). Rates of HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion in group A were significantly higher than rates in group C (P<0.001 for both) or group D (HBsAg loss: P=0.002; HBsAg seroconversion: P<0.001).ConclusionsThe results of this analysis confirm the results from earlier time points which demonstrate the increased rate of HBsAg loss in patients treated with a finite course of PEG-IFN plus TDF compared with the rates in patients receiving either monotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available