4.4 Article

Pharmacologic Evaluation of Sulfasalazine, FTY720, and Anti-IL-12/23p40 in a TNBS-Induced Crohn's Disease Model

Journal

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
Volume 56, Issue 8, Pages 2283-2291

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1628-8

Keywords

IBD; TNBS; Sulfasalazine; FTY720; Anti-IL-12/23p40

Funding

  1. Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background 2,4,6-Trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis has been used as an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD), preclinical model. However, published data on pharmacologic and therapeutic efficacy testing of this model are limited. FTY720 inhibits lymphoid cell trafficking in inflammatory conditions and is of interest to treat IBD. Aim We investigated the pharmacologic therapeutic efficacy of sulfasalazine, FTY720, and anti-IL-12/23p40, in a TNBS CD model. Methods Female, 7-week-old, BALB/c mice were given sulfasalazine orally (PO) and intraperitoneally (IP) at 10 mg/kg, FTY720 at 3 mg/kg PO, and mouse anti-IL-12/23p40 at 25 mg/kg IP. Vehicle groups given PO either phosphate-buffered saline/water or 40% ethanol served as controls. Pharmacologic efficacy was assessed using body weight loss, clinical scores of diarrhea and intestinal gross pathology, and colon weight parameters. Results Sulfasalazine and FTY720 treatment did not prevent body weight loss or reduce clinical scores of diarrhea or intestinal gross pathology, when compared with vehicle treatment. However, anti-IL-12/23p40 treatment showed significant efficacy by preventing body weight loss, reducing clinical scores of diarrhea, and reducing intestinal gross pathologic lesions, when compared with vehicle-treated animals. Sulfasalazine, anti-IL-12/23p40, and FTY720 were not effective in reducing colon weight. Conclusions With the exception of anti-IL-12/23p40, sulfasalazine, and FTY720 did not demonstrate full pharmacologic efficacy in our TNBS CD model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available