4.5 Article

Silibinin improves hepatic and myocardial injury in mice with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 334-342

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.11.010

Keywords

Heart; Inflammation; NAFLD; Oxidative stress; Silibinin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a chronic metabolic disorder with significant impact on cardiovascular and liver mortality. Aims: In this study, we examined the effects of silibinin on liver and myocardium injury in an experimental model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Methods: A four-week daily dose of silibinin (20 mg/kg i.p.) was administrated to db/db mice fed a methionine-choline deficient diet. Hepatic and myocardial histology, oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines were evaluated. Results: Silibinin administration decreased HOMA-IR, serum ALT and markedly improved hepatic and myocardial damage. Silibinin reduced isoprostanes, 8-deoxyguanosine and nitrites/nitrates in the liver and in the heart of db/db fed the methionine-choline deficient diet, whereas glutathione levels were restored to lean mice levels in both tissues. Consistently, liver mitochondrial respiratory chain activity was significantly impaired in untreated mice and was completely restored in silibinin-treated animals. TNF-alpha was increased whereas IL-6 was decreased both in the liver and heart of db/db fed methionine-choline deficient diet. Silibinin reversed heart TNF-alpha and IL-6 expression to control mice levels. Indeed, liver JNK phosphorylation was reduced to control levels in treated animals. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a combined effectiveness of silibinin on improving liver and myocardial injury in experimental nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. (C) 2011 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available