4.6 Article

Impact of Fetal-Neonatal Iron Deficiency on Recognition Memory at 2 Months of Age

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 167, Issue 6, Pages 1226-1232

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.08.035

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P01 HD039386]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [81273085]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To assess the effects of fetal-neonatal iron deficiency on recognition memory in early infancy. Perinatal iron deficiency delays or disrupts hippocampal development in animal models and thus may impair related neural functions in human infants, such as recognition memory. Study design Event-related potentials were used in an auditory recognition memory task to compare 2-month-old Chinese infants with iron sufficiency or deficiency at birth. Fetal-neonatal iron deficiency was defined 2 ways: high zinc protoporphyrin/heme ratio (ZPP/H > 118 mu mol/mol) or low serum ferritin (< 75 mu g/L) in cord blood. Late slow wave was used to measure infant recognition of mother's voice. Results Event related potentials patterns differed significantly for fetal-neonatal iron deficiency as defined by high cord ZPP/H but not low ferritin. Comparing 35 infants with iron deficiency (ZPP/H > 118 mu mol/mol) to 92 with lower ZPP/H (iron-sufficient), only infants with iron sufficiency showed larger late slow wave amplitude for stranger's voice than mother's voice in frontal-central and parietal-occipital locations, indicating the recognition of mother's voice. Conclusions Infants with iron sufficiency showed electrophysiological evidence of recognizing their mother's voice, whereas infants with fetal-neonatal iron deficiency did not. Their poorer auditory recognition memory at 2 months of age is consistent with effects of fetal-neonatal iron deficiency on the developing hippocampus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available