4.5 Article

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in evaluating hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumours

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 635-641

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.01.009

Keywords

Carcinoids; Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours; Liver metastases; Pancreatic endocrine tumours

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: At presentation, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) frequently show prognostically negative hepatic involvement. The aim of this study was to characterise hepatic metastases of GEP NETs as revealed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), which allows the fine definition of the microvascular system, and to correlate these findings to the biological behaviour of the tumour. Methods: Eighteen out of 62 GEP NET patients examined between January 2007 and September 2008 had histologically proven hepatic metastases from primary ileal (#6), gastric (#1) or rectal (#1) carcinoids, pancreatic tumours (#7), or primary duodenal (#2) or occult gastrinomas (#1), and all underwent low mechanical index real-time CEUS with SonoVue (R) injection. Results: Strong early enhancement in the arterial phase was observed in 15 cases (83%), and a rapid washout in the portal venous phase in 14 (78%). In the late venous phase, the lesions were hypoechoic in 12 cases (67%), isoechoic in five (28%), and hyperechoic in one (0.05%). The time of arterial enhancement correlated with the Ki-67 proliferative index (r(s) = 0.516; p = 0.028). Conclusions: Most of the neuroendocrine liver metastases showed increased arterial enhancement at CEUS, a behaviour that is similar to that of hepatocellular carcinomas and the opposite of that of other metastases. CEUS can be a useful diagnostic means of characterising such metastases. (C) 2010 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available