4.5 Article

Diagnostic value of rapid urease test and urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori detection in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy: A prospective controlled trial

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 4-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.05.010

Keywords

Billroth II; Helicobacter pylori; Kappa agreement; Rapid urease test; Sensitivity; Specificity; Urea breath test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim. The aim of this work was to assess the reliability of rapid urease test (RUT) and urea breath test (UBT) for detecting Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in patients with Billroth II (BII) gastrectomy, using histology as reference. Methods. In this prospective controlled study, 31 consecutive patients with 1311 gastrectomy and 73 controls who had an indication for endoscopy were included. Their H. pylori status was assessed with biopsies for histology, RUT and UBT. Histology served as the gold standard. Only the biopsies from the gastric fundus were evaluated. Specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value, degree of agreement and k-statistics were used. Results. RUT and UBT for detecting H. pylori in the control group had excellent agreement [97%, kappa (k)=0.94 and 99%, k=0.97 respectively] with biopsies. In BII patients, RUT from fundic biopsies had very good agreement (87%, k=0.74) compared to histology from fundic biopsies, whereas the UBT was unreliable (agreement: 71%, k=0.41) compared to histology. Conclusion. The RUT from fundic biopsies in BII patients is a reliable test for H. pylori detection, whereas the UBT is unreliable. (C) 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available