4.5 Article

Possible involvement of androgen receptor alterations in hepatocarcinogenesis

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 665-670

Publisher

PACINI EDITORE
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.12.099

Keywords

Liver cancer; Gender disparities; Sex steroid hormones

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Androgen receptors (ARs) act as transcription factors. An increased AR activity could be due either to mutations or to an increased expression of the receptor. AR mutations involving the hormone binding domain could increase AR function and promote carcinogenesis, as suggested for prostate cancer. Aims: Herein, we evaluated qualitative (point mutations involving the hormone binding domain) and quantitative AR alterations and their possible correlation with cell proliferation and tumour grading. Materials: Carcinomatous and non-cancerous surrounding liver tissue was collected from 14 Caucasian patients with hepatocarcinoma. They were all affected by cirrhosis with different aetiologies. Methods: AR missense mutations, AR mRNA and protein levels, AR distribution in the liver, liver cell proliferation, and turnout staging were evaluated by DNA sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR, Western blot analysis, immunofluorescence, PCNA immunostaining, and conventional histological techniques, respectively. Results: AR gene regions encoding the hormone binding domain did not contain any missense mutation. AR mRNA and protein levels were increased in hepatocarcinoma compared to non-cancerous surrounding tissue. Cell proliferation was significantly increased in the turnout compared to non-cancerous surrounding tissue. Conclusions: Mutations of the AR regions studied were not involved in hepatocarcinogenesis. Elevated AR levels in transformed cells could have a tumour promoting effect by stimulating cell growth. (C) 2009 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available