4.5 Article

Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) can predict liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 267-274

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.10.011

Keywords

aspartate aminotransferase; hepatitis B; liver fibrosis; METAVIR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. There have been still few valuable markers that can be used as indirect markers of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. Aims. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy of several indirect markers of liver fibrosis and to identify the most valuable test in chronic hepatitis B. Patients and methods. A total of 264 patients with chronic hepatitis B were consecutively enrolled. Fibrosis was staged by a single blinded pathologist according to the METAVIR system. Significant fibrosis was defined as stage >= 2. We investigated diagnostic accuracy of four indirect markers including aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index for predicting significant fibrosis. Results. Mean age was 28 years. 53% (141/264) had significant hepatic fibrosis. Of indirect markers, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index yielded the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.91). Positive predictive value/negative predictive value at 0.5, 1.5 and 2.0 of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index score for predicting significant fibrosis were 63%/91%, 83%/74% and 86%/65%, respectively. The odds ratio for aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index >= 1.4 relative to less than aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index of 1.4 was 17.971 (l) <0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 9.677-33.376). Conclusions. Of simple markers already developed in chronic hepatitis C, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index may be the most accurate and simple marker for predicting significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. (c) 2007 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available