4.3 Article

Patient Selection for Therapy Reduction after Long-Term Daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment for Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease: Trial and Error

Journal

DIGESTION
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 85-90

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000345144

Keywords

Proton pump inhibitor; Therapy reduction; Primary care; Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; Pantoprazole

Funding

  1. AltanaPharma BV, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy reduction after long-term daily treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptomatology proves difficult in primary care practice. We aimed to identify patient and/or disease characteristics in long-term daily PPI users predicting a successful switch to less than daily therapy. Methods: GORD patients who after long-term continuous treatment were able to use less than a daily PPI dose in a placebo-controlled trial were compared to patients who persisted in a daily dosage with respect to general, lifestyle and quality of life characteristics (SF-36 Health Survey) as well as psychological factors (Symptom Check List 90), symptom control on daily PPI (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire), disease and medication history. Results: Adequate symptom control on daily PPI use and female gender were determinants of successful therapy reduction. A prediction rule including the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia vitality dimension and gender correctly predicted 64% of patients to both less than daily and sustained daily treatment (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.69). Conclusion: In the heterogeneous population of PPI users for GORD in primary care, no clinically useful, easily obtainable combination of patient characteristics was able to adequately predict eligibility for therapy reduction. Switching to less than daily therapy remains a process of trial and error in which motivation of the patient and support by the physician will be important factors for success. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available