4.3 Article

A Combination of α-Fetoprotein and Des-γ-Carboxy Prothrombin Is Superior in Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Journal

DIGESTION
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 121-131

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000346080

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; alpha-Fetoprotein; Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin; Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; Tumor marker

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG SCHL 377/4-2, 6-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aim: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in western countries. Despite its low sensitivity, the diagnosis of HCC still depends on detection of a-fetoprotein (AFP). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the combined analysis of AFP and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) in a European cohort. Methods: We performed a single-center study (164 HCC/422 controls), in which the serum concentrations of AFP and DCP were determined. Results: AFP and DCP were elevated in HCC patients compared to controls (p < 0.0001). By combination of AFP and DCP, the sensitivity was improved from 28.7% for AFP (cutoff 400 ng/ml; AFP at cutoff 10 ng/ml: 54.9%) to 78.0% using cutoffs of 10 ng/ml for AFP and 5 ng/ml for DCP (DCP alone, cutoff 5 ng/ml: 63.4%). Among early-stage patients, the sensitivity increased from 20% for AFP (cutoff 400 ng/ml; AFP at cutoff 10 ng/ml: 38%) to 55% in combination (DCP alone, cutoff 5 ng/ml: 47%). The area under the curve (AUC) for AFP and DCP was similar (AFP: 0.88; DCP: 0.87; combined: 0.91). Among non-cirrhotic patients, DCP (AUC: 0.93) showed a better performance than AFP (AUC: 0.84). Especially patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis had a high percentage of DCP-positive tumors. Conclusion: The data suggest that AFP alone is not sufficient for the serological diagnosis of HCC in European patients, while a combination of AFP and DCP can increase the sensitivity even in early-stage patients. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available