4.3 Article

Therapy of Steroid-Resistant Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Journal

DIGESTION
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 11-15

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000341952

Keywords

Crohn's disease; Ulcerative colitis; Steroid-resistant inflammatory bowel disease

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [33CSC0_134274, 32003B_135665/1, 310030-120312, 320000-114009/3, 32473B_135694/1]
  2. Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology of the University of Zurich
  3. Abbott
  4. UCB
  5. MSD
  6. Tillotts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims: Although systemic corticosteroids are successfully administered for the induction of clinical response and remission in the majority of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) presenting with a flare, a proportion of these patients demonstrate a primary nonresponse to steroids or in the case of an initial response, they develop a resistance or a steroid dependence. Long-term therapy with corticosteroids for treatment of IBD should be avoided, given the high frequency of adverse treatment effects. Knowledge about treatment strategies in case of steroid nonresponse is therefore highly relevant. Methods: A systematic literature research was performed using Medline and Embase to summarize the currently recommended treatment strategies for steroid-resistant IBD. Results:Treatment of steroid-resistant Crohn's disease is based on the introduction of immunomodulators such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine or methotrexate, the anti-TNF drugs infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol. In the case of steroid resistance in ulcerative colitis, aminosalicylates, the above-mentioned immunomodulators, infliximab, adalimumab or calcineurin inhibitors such as ciclosporin or tacrolimus may be administered. Conclusion:This review summarizes the current evidence for treating steroid-resistant IBD. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available