4.3 Article

Risk Factors for Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage: Japanese Multicenter Study

Journal

DIGESTION
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages 261-265

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000336351

Keywords

Diverticular hemorrhage; Risk factors; Colon; Lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aim: Diverticular hemorrhage is the common cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and its incidence has been increasing in Japan. However, the exact cause of diverticular hemorrhage is not well understood. We investigated the risk factors for diverticular hemorrhage. Methods: We selected 103 patients with diverticular hemorrhage as cases and patients with colonic diverticulosis without a history of bleeding were selected as control subjects, exactly matched for age and gender. We collected the data from the medical records of each of the patients, such as those related to the comorbidities, medications and findings of colonoscopy, and conducted a matched case-control study to analyze the risk factors for diverticular hemorrhage. Results: Both groups were composed of 75 men and 28 women. The median age of the patients in both groups was 72.0 years (47.0-87.0). The body weight (p = 0.0065), body mass index (p = 0.006), prevalence of hypertension (p = 0.0242), prevalence of ischemic heart disease (p = 0.0015), and frequency of use of low-dose aspirin (p = 0.042) were significantly different between the two groups. The percentage of patients with bilateral diverticula, that is, diverticula on both the right and left hemicolon, was significantly higher in the diverticular hemorrhage group (p = 0.0011). Multiple regression analysis identified only the diverticular location as being significantly associated with the risk of diverticular hemorrhage (p = 0.0021). Conclusions: Only the diverticular location (bilateral) was found to be an independent risk factor for diverticular hemorrhage. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available