4.3 Article

Clinical Relevance of IgG Antibodies against Food Antigens in Crohn's Disease: A Double-Blind Cross-Over Diet Intervention Study

Journal

DIGESTION
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 252-264

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000264649

Keywords

Crohn's disease; Immunoglobulin G antibodies; Food antigen; Interferon

Funding

  1. German Competence Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (KN-CED)
  2. Evomed MedizinService GmbH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Environmental factors are thought to play an important role in the development of Crohn's disease (CD). Immune responses against auto-antigens or food antigens may be a reason for the perpetuation of inflammation. Methods: In a pilot study, 79 CD patients and 20 healthy controls were examined for food immunoglobulin G (IgG). Thereafter, the clinical relevance of these food IgG antibodies was assessed in a double-blind cross-over study with 40 patients. Based on the IgG antibodies, a nutritional intervention was planned. The interferon (IFN)gamma secretion of T cells was measured. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin was quantified in stool. Results: The pilot study resulted in a significant difference of IgG antibodies in serum between CD patients and healthy controls. In 84 and 83% of the patients, respectively, IgG antibodies against processed cheese and yeast were detected. The daily stool frequency significantly decreased by 11% during a specific diet compared with a sham diet. Abdominal pain reduced and general well-being improved. IFN gamma secretion of T cells increased. No difference for eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in stool was detected. Conclusion: A nutritional intervention based on circulating IgG antibodies against food antigens showed effects with respect to stool frequency. The mechanisms by which IgG antibodies might contribute to disease activity remain to be elucidated. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available